Asesment Bangunan Gedung di Universitas Tadulako Palu pasca Gempa 28 September 2018 untuk Pelaksanaan Rehabilitasi dan Rekonstruksi

I.K.  Sulendra

doi:10.22487/renstra.v2i1.237

Authors

I.K. Sulendra Jurusan Teknik Sipil Universitas Tadulako, Jl. Soekarno Hatta Km. 9 Palu 94118, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22487/renstra.v2i1.237

Keywords:

assessment, building structure, damage category, , rehabilitiation and reconstruction

Abstract

After September 28 2018 Palu strong shock (7,5 Mw) caused damages of buildings, not exceptly on Tadulako University in Palu City. Those secondary impact of earthquakes i.e: lighweight, moderate, heavy damages until collaps of buildings. Therefore those impact caused activity proccess in this campus delayed. After shock caused damages many building, assessment of those buildings are necessary. Output of assessment needed for rehabilitation and reconstruction stages. The characteristics and types of damages very important to knew to next stages i.e: built back better post of earthquake disaster. Generally methods of assessment buildings after shock i.e : Rapid Visual Screening (RPS), Semi Destructive and Rapis Analysis and Detailing Analysis include Review Design with Up to Date Standard Design. This assessment used “Quick Assessment for Non Engineered Structures” from Directorat General of Building PUPR for simple building (only one story building) and Level-1 Assessment Methods from World Bank for Engineered Structures. Those assessment verification of : 140 unit building , 69 unit and 19 unit of lighweight, moderate ang heavy damages until failure respectively. Two years after the disaster, rehabilitation and reconstruction process i.e: 160 unit of non engineered building with lightweight-moderate damage has been repaired. Then on going process build of 10 muliperpuse steel frame of two stories building, with 12 class room each buildings. For engineered building with moderate damage category, this year until next year to retroffiting of structurals elemens, this retrofit to do for anticipate the next damage earthquakes. The rehabilitation and reconstruction process until 2023 for completly build after Palu Earthquakes. Next year until 2023 priority rehabilitation and rehabilitation for retroffiting main engineered structures building i.e: rektorat, auditorium, hospital, laboratory and rechange collaping building after diasaster.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

I.M. Watkinson and R. Hall, “Fault Systems of The Eastern Indonesian Triple Junction: Evaluation of Quaternary Activity and Implications for Seismic Hazards”, Geological Society, vol. 441, no. 1, p. 7, 2016.

Y. Afriadi and I. Satyarno, “Perbandingan Spektra Desain Beberapa Kota Besar di Indonesia dalam SNI Gempa 2012 dan SNI Gempa 2012”, Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Teknik Sipil 7 (KoNTekS 7) Univesitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, p. 1, 2013.

R. Paulik, A. Gusman, J.H. Williams, G.M. Pratama, S. Lin, A. Prawirabhakti, I.K. Sulendra, M.Y. Zachari, Z.E.D. Fortuna, N.B.P. Layuk, and N.W.I. Suwarni, “Tsunami Hazard and Built Environment Damage Observations from Palu City after The September 28 2018 Palu Earthquake and Tsunami”, Pure and Applied Geophysics, vol. 176, p. 3305, 2019.

A. Dolu, I.K. Sulendra, J. Hasan, and G.M. Oka, “Kegagalan Struktur Bangunan dan Jembatan Saat Gempa Palu 28 September 2018”, Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Teknik Sipil ke-13, vol. 1, p. 1, 2019.

Tim Pusat Studi Gempa Nasional (PuSGeN), Kajian Gempa Palu Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah, Palu: Pusat Gempa Nasional, 2019.

I.K. Sulendra, A. Dolu, I.S. Oktaviana, and T.M. Kamaludin, “Lesson Learned from 28 September 2018 Palu-Donggala Earthquake”, Proceeding of The 4th International Conference on Earthquake and Disaster Mitigation, p. 1, 2019.

A. Widiati, “Aplikasi Manajemen Risiko Bencana Alam dalam Penataan Ruang Kabupaten Nabire, Jurnal Sain dan Teknologi Indonesia, vol. 10 no. 1, p. 7, 2008.

U. Hauptmanns, “A Risk-Based Approach to Land-Use Planning”, Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 125, no. 1-3, p. 1, 2015.

Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana, Kerangka Kerja Sendai untuk Pengurangan Risika Bencana, Jakarta: Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2020, 2015.

E. Anantasari, M. Daly, P. Glassey, E. Grace, M. Coomer, and R. Wood, “Disaster risk reduction (DRR) Capacity and Capability of Local Government in Indonesia, Disaster Risk Reduction in Indonesia, p. 127, 2020.

G. Ananda, T. Ophyandri, and E. Hasymi, “Resilience Measurement of Padang City’s Infrastructures Toward Multi-Hazard”, Proceeding of The 4th International Conference on Earthquake and Disaster Mitigation, p. 1, 2019.

C.S. Oliveira, The Influence of Scale on Microzonation and Impact Studies, Chapter 2, Recent Advances in Erthquake Geotechnical Engineering and Microzonation, Netherlands: Academic Publihshing, 2004.

A. Kijko, S.J.P. Retief and G. Graham. ”Seismic Hazard Risk Assessment Tulbagh, South Africa: Part II – Assessment of Seismic Risk”, Natural Hazard, vol. 30, p. 25, 2003.

K.S. Vatsa, “Risk,Vulnerability, and Asset-based Approach to Dissater Risk Management, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, vol. 24 no. 10, pp. 1, 2014.

Pusat Pengembangan Perumahan dan Pemukiman, Panduan Praktis Pemeriksaan Kerusakan Rumah Tembok akibat Gempa Bumi, Bandung: Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat, 2006.

PUPR, Behavior of Building during Earthquake, Technical Knowledge Sharing, Palu: PUPR-World Bank, 2020.

T. Plattner, T. Plapp, and B. Habel, “Integrating Public Risk Perception into Formal Natural Risk Assessment”, Journal of Natural Hazard and Earthquake System Sciences, vol. 6, p. 671, 2006.

M. Wahyono, S. Nurdin, A. Bedu, W.N. Ekoa, and R.N. Sari, “Penerapan Teorema Probabilitas Total dalam Analisis Resiko Gempa”, Rekonstruksi Tadulako: Civil Engineering Journal on Research And Development, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 23, 2020.