Analisis Penjadwalan Waktu Pekerjaan Pada Proyek Jalan Kawasan Ekonomi Khusus (KEK) Pantoloan Menggunakan Linear Scheduling Method (LSM)

Authors

  • A. Asnudin Jurusan Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Tadulako, Jl. Soekarno-Hatta Km 9, Palu 94118, Indonesia
  • R. Ramlan Jurusan Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Tadulako, Jl. Soekarno-Hatta Km 9, Palu 94118, Indonesia
  • P.A. Ganiya Alimni Jurusan Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Tadulako, Jl. Soekarno-Hatta Km 9, Palu 94118, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22487/renstra.v6i1.683

Keywords:

repetitive construction, project scheduling, Linear Scheduling Method

Abstract

A construction project is a temporary activity with a specific end goal. One of the crucial things in the construction process is work scheduling, this is because it can affect the duration and cost of the project. In the context of scheduling, methods such as Block Charts, S-Curves, Network Diagrams, and Balance Line Diagrams/Linear Scheduling Method (LSM) has been around for a long time, but in its application the scheduling method should be adjusted to the characteristics of the project to avoid losses in development. The LSM method is considered appropriate for work that is repetitive in nature. This research aims at analyzing time scheduling for road projects in the Pantoloan Special Economic Area (SEA), Central Sulawesi, using Linear Scheduling Method (LSM). The purpose of this research is to determine the comparison of scheduling and budget plans between the LSM and project methods existing. Data collection consisting of primary data and secondary data was obtained by direct observation in the field and interviews with related parties. Then a scheduling analysis is carried out with assistance software. From the research results on the scheduling of the Pantoloan KEK Road Section Handling Project in Palu City using the LSM method, the completion time was 47 days. Meanwhile, in the initial planning, a completion time of 60 days was required, so there was a difference of 13 days. The project budget plan using the LSM method obtained IDR 2.321.225.151,01. Meanwhile, the initial project budget plan is Rp. 2,365,900,000.00 so there is a cost difference of Rp. 44.674.849.- By looking at the comparison of time effectiveness, scheduling using the LSM method is more effective and efficient.

References

I. Soeharto, Manajemen Proyek (Dari Konseptual Sampai Operasional), Jakarta: Erlangga, 1999.

M. Fazis and T. Tugiah, “Perencanaan Proyek dan Penjadwalan Proyek”, Jurnal Sosial Teknologi, vol. 2, no. 12, p. 1365, 2022.

A. Asnudin and I. Rahmatullah, “Analisis Faktor-Faktor dalam Perencanaan Alokasi Tenaga Kerja Konstruksi pada Proyek Rehabilitasi dan Rekonstruksi Sarana Pendidikan Universitas Tadulako Fase I”, Inersia Jurnal Teknik Sipil, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 1, 2024.

H. Kerzner, Project Management: A system Approach to Planning, Schedulling, and Controlling, New Jersey: John and Wiley. Inc, 2006.

J. Shi, Current Teaching of Linear Scheduling Method, Dakota: ISEC Press, 2002.

A. Asnudin, “Faktor Faktor Mempengaruhi Pekerja Konstruksi Mememilih Sistem Pembayaran Upah Kerja (Kasus Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah)”, Inersia Jurnal Teknik Sipil, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 48, 2021.

R. Arifudin, “Optimasi Penjadwalan Proyek Dengan Penyeimbangan Biaya Menggunakan Kombinasi CPM Dan Algoritma Genetika”, Jurnal Masyarakat Informasi, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 1, 2012.

A. Bhaskara, FM. Maulana, and A.M. Masagala, “Analisis Penjadwalan Waktu Dan Biaya Proyek Dengan Menggunakan Linear Scheduling Method”, Jurnal Teknik Sipil, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 60, 2021.

M. Kareth, H. Tarore, J. Tjakra, and D. Walangitan, “Analisis Optimalisasi Waktu dan Biaya dengan Program Primavera 6.0 (Studi Kasus: Proyek Perumahan Puri Kelapa Gading)”, Jurnal Sipil Statik, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 1, 2012.

N. Saputra, E. Handayani, and A. Dwiretnani, “Analisa Penjadwalan Proyek dengan Metode Critical Path Method (CPM) Studi Kasus Pembangunan Gedung Rawat Inap RSUD Abdul Manap Kota Jambi”, Jurnal Talenta Sipil, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 44, 2021.

H. Dimyati and K. Nurjaman, Manajemen Proyek, Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2014.

Nurhayati, Manajemen Proyek, Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2010.

F. Laia, Penerapan Metode Line of Balance Pada Penjadwalan Proyek Jalan Preservasi Teluk Dalam – Lolowau, Medan: Universitas Medan Area, 2020.

Mawdsley, Practically Management, UK: University of Durham, 1997.

Nugraheni, Analisis Penjadwalan Ulang Proyek Dengan Memanfaatkan Line of Balance Diagram, Yogyakarta: Universitas Islam Indonesia 2024.

W. Sudarson, “Evaluasi Penjadwalan Proyek Dengan Metode Line of Balance (Studi Kasus: Hotel Santika Batam)”, Journal of Civil Engineering and Planning, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 92, 2020.

E. Rochmalasari, Evaluasi Penjadawalan Berulang dengan Menggunkan Metode Linear Scheduling Method (LSM) Pada Proyek Gedung Gelanggang Generasi Muda, Bandung, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 2019.

J. Halimi, Analisis Penjadwalan Ulang Dengan Menggunakan Metode LSM, Yogyakarta: Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2018.

Yamin, Pengembangan KEK Palu Harus Didukung Semua Pihak, Palu: Media Alkhairaat, 2023.

Anonim, KEK Kota Palu, Palu: PT. Bangun Palu Sulawesi Tengah (BPST), 2014.

Novriyadi, Peta Palu Lengkap dengan Nama Kecamatan, Palu: BAPEDDA, 2024.

Kementrian Pekerjaan Umum Dan Perumahan Rakyat, Pedoman Penyusunan Perkiraan Biaya Pekerjaan Konstruksi-AHSP Bidang Bina Marga, Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Bina Marga, 2022.

A.N. Fatimah, Studi Perbandingan Penjadawalan Proyek Konstruksi dengan Metode Line of Balance (LOB) dan Precedence Diagram Methode (PDM), Makassar: Universitas Hasanuddin, 2023.

F. Miraji, N. Suhana, and K. Komarudin, “Perbandingan Metode Line of Balance dan Precedence Diagram Metod untuk Pekerjaan Konstruksi Gedung 3 Lantai”, Jurnal Rekayasa Infrastruktur”, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 118, 2023.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-28

How to Cite

Asnudin, A., Ramlan, R., & Ganiya, P. (2025). Analisis Penjadwalan Waktu Pekerjaan Pada Proyek Jalan Kawasan Ekonomi Khusus (KEK) Pantoloan Menggunakan Linear Scheduling Method (LSM). REKONSTRUKSI TADULAKO: Civil Engineering Journal on Research and Development, 6(1), 29-36. https://doi.org/10.22487/renstra.v6i1.683

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.