Pengaruh Groundsill Pada Degradasi dan Agradasi Dasar Sungai Winongo (Studi Kasus Simulasi Dengan Sedimen D50)

Authors

  • Q. Ananta Jurusan Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55183
  • S.B. Lesmana Jurusan Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55183
  • T. Tahadjuddin Jurusan Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Muhammadiyah Sukabumi, Jawa Barat, Indonesia, 43113
  • P. Harsanto Jurusan Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55183

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22487/renstra.v4i2.583

Keywords:

degradation, agradation, MPM, Englund Hansen, Laursen Copeland

Abstract

One of the rivers in Yogyakarta with sand as its riverbed material is the Winongo River, which has a high potential for riverbed degradation or agradation. Upstream and downstream of the groundsill construction, respectively, can experience degradation and agradation of sediment transport. In this research, the effectiveness of the MPM, Engelund Hansen, and Laursen Copeland equations on HEC-RAS 6.3.1 is examined in terms of determining the level of overall degradation and agradation of the Winongo River bed. The discharge data used in modeling is in the form of secondary data taken from the 2021 DPUPESDM using two discharge conditions, namely wet discharge (Feb-Mar) and dry discharge (August-Sept). There are 796 cross sections along the river's 41.3 kilometer length, 9 of which are groundsill structures. For all equations, d50 serves as the grain diameter. Based on the results of the simulation, the upstream groundsill frequently agradation while the downstream groundsill tends to degradation. The MPM and Engelund Hansen equations are closer to actual field survey than the Laursen Copeland equation, according to the simulation using the three equations. The nine groundsills on the Winongo River still have the potential to harm the river bank by collapsing the downstream portion of the structure because the condition of degradation in the downstream groundsill is more prevalent than aggradation in the upstream groundsill. Due to the average d50 grain size, it is more likely that models used to predict changes in river bed elevation may degrade

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

R. Marlina, N., Hudori, H., and Hafidh, “Pengaruh Kekasaran Saluran dan Suhu Air Sungai pada Parameter Kualitas Air COD, TSS Di Sungai Winongo Menggunakan Software QUAL2KW”, Jurnal Sains &Teknologi Lingkungan, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 122, 2017.

R. Wigati, I.A. Rakhmatika, W. Fathonah, B.A. Priyambodho, N.P. Purnaditya, and Soedarsono, “Normalisasi Sungai Cilemer Kabupaten Pandeglang, Banten (Studi Kasus HM 00+00 sampai HM 153+00)”, Fondasi Jurnal Teknik Sipil, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 219, 2022.

H.D. Dalrino, I.M. Aguskamar, and Pertiwi, “Sedimentation Study at Batang Lampasi River,” Jurnal Ilmiah Poli Rekayasa, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 20, 2019.

R.M. Arrazy, L.S. Hendratta, and A. Halim, “Analisis Angkutan Sedimen di Sungai Air Kolongan Kabupaten Minahasa Utara”, Jurnal Sipil Statik, vol. 6, no. 12, p. 1043, 2018.

D. Harjono and P. Permana, “Kajian Ulang Control Stabilitas Groundsill Bendung Gerak Sungai Bengawan Solo di Kabupaten Bojonegoro”, D’Teksi, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 13, 2020.

M. Bravikawati, E. Fatimah, and Ziana, “Penanganan Degradasi Dasar Sungai Krueng Jantho dengan Perencanaan Groundsill”, Journal of The Civil Engineering Student, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 141, 2021.

Nomeritae, H.M. Yupi and Hafentina, “Rekayasa Hidraulik untuk Pengendalian Erosi dan Sedimentasi Ruas Sungai Kahayan Berstruktur Membentang Sungai”, Teknika, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 57, 2018.

F. Akbar and V. Pratiwi, “Evaluasi Kapasitas Waduk Setiabudi Barat dalam Penanggulangan Banjir Jakarta Selatan dengan Pemodelan HEC-RAS 4.1.0”, CRANE: Civil Engineering Research Journal, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 1, 2020.

S. Budi, V. Dermawan, and E. Yuliani, “Efektifitas Groundsill Terhadap Penyebaran Sedimen Sungai Grindulu Kabupaten Pacitan”, Jurnal Teknik Pengairan, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 112, 2017.

A.D. Pangestu and S.A.Y. Astuti, “Studi Gerusan Di Hilir Bendung Kolam Olak Tipe Vlughter dengan Perlindungan Groundsill”, Jurnal Teknisia, vol. 23, no. 1, p. 463, 2018.

K. Sulistya, Indrawan, and I. Sriyana, “Pengujian Model Fisik Terhadap Karakteristik Hidraulik Akibat Pemasangan Groundsill pada Saluran Pembawa Bangunan Pelimpah Bendungan Pidekso”, Wahana Teknik Sipil, vol. 27, no. 1, p. 43, 2022.

Suharto and R.E. Indarti, “Analisis Angkutan Sedimen Kali Progo”, Teras, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 59, 2019.

A. Fitri, H. Chen, L. Yao, K. Zheng, Susarman, F. Rossi, and Y. Yin, “Evaluation of the Groundsill’s Stability at Downstream of Citorek Bridge in Cimadur River, Banten Province”, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 880, no. 012029, 2021.

A. Miardini, “Dinamika Bnetukan Lahan Fluval Akibat Sedimentasi Di Sungai Grindulu, Segmen Arjosari-Pacitan”, Jurnal Penelitian Pengelolaan Daerah Aliran Sungai, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 13, 2019.

E. Setiawan, C. Ikhsan, and R.R. Hadiani, “Caused Shift Voltage Degradation and Agradation on River”, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 243, no. 012019, 2019.

P. Harsanto, Nursetiawan, B.P. Kamiel, and I. Cahyani, “Riverbed Erosion Analysis of Winongo River Using HEC-RAS 5.0.7”, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 933, no. 012026, 2021.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-01

How to Cite

Ananta, Q. ., Lesmana, S., Tahadjuddin, T., & Harsanto, P. (2023). Pengaruh Groundsill Pada Degradasi dan Agradasi Dasar Sungai Winongo (Studi Kasus Simulasi Dengan Sedimen D50). REKONSTRUKSI TADULAKO: Civil Engineering Journal on Research and Development, 4(2), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.22487/renstra.v4i2.583

Issue

Section

Articles