The Application of Coopeartif Learning Model type STAD Assisted with Broad Transparent Diagrams, Alva board and Circle models to Improve Student Learning Outcomes on Broadly Simple Facets and Circles in Class VIA at SDN 15 Palu

Authors

  • Najmawati Universitas Tadulako
  • Sudarman Universitas Tadulako, Palu Indonesia
  • Muhammad Rizal Universitas Tadulako

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22487/j25490192.2017.v1.i1.pp17-30

Keywords:

Cooperative Learning Model Type STAD Assisted with Board Transparant Diagrams, Students Learning Outcomes, Broadly Simple Facets and Circles

Abstract

This research aims to describe the application of cooperative learning model type STAD assisted with broad transparent diagram, Alva board, and circle models to improve student learning outcomes on broadly simple facets and circles. This study was classroom action research (CAR) that refers to the design of Kemmis and Mc Taggart: planning, action, observation, and reflection and was conducted in two cycles. The results showed that the application of coopeartive learning model type STAD assisted with board transparant diagrams, alva board and circle model can improve student learning outcomes on broadly simpe facets and circle by using STAD steps: (1) teachers demonstrated a wide range of flat, simple rectangles, and circles by involving students using broad transparent diagram props, broadly alva-board models and circles; (2) the teacher conveied the scores / initial values of the students' abilities obtained from the daily test scores and the student's initial test; (3) the teacher established a group of students based on the academic ability of the high, moderate and low-ability students; (4) the teacher distributed LKS to the students done with group discussions, guiding students in turns doing LKS, randomly assigning student attendance number to do group presentation in front of class and giving reinforcement to student to the completion of LKS; (5) teacher gave quiz to the student individually and they do not allowed help each other; (6) the teacher guides the students to make summaries, direct and affirm the learning materials learned; (7) the teacher announced the achievement of the average score obtained by each group and rewards the group based on the group award criteria in a way- a certain way, and give an opportunity to that group who got a high average score to ask questions to a designated student outside his or her group and write the answer on the blackboard.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Najmawati, Universitas Tadulako

Pendidikan Sains Program Magister Pascasarjana Universitas Tadulako

Sudarman, Universitas Tadulako, Palu Indonesia

Pendidikan Matematika Program Magister, Pascasarjana Universitas Tadulako

Muhammad Rizal, Universitas Tadulako

Pendidikan Matematika Program Magister, Pascasarjana Universitas Tadulako

References

Barlian.( 2013). Begitu pentingkah strategi belajar mengajar bagi guru?. Jurnal Forum Sosial. 6(1), 6 halaman.

BSNP. ( 2006). Kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah

Depdiknas. (2006). Bunga rampai keberhasilan guru dalam pembelajaran (SMA, SMK, dan SLB). Jakarta: Depdiknas

Laila, F. (2011). Pengaruh model pembelajaran cooperative tipe group investigation (GI) dan STAD terhadap prestasi belajar matematika ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar siswa. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika MIPA UNY, 18 halaman.

Gintings, A. (2008). Esensi praktis belajar dan pembelajaran. Bandung: HUMANIORA.

Hariyanto, B. (2010). Upaya peningkatan hasil belajar luas bangun segi banyak sederhana melalui media pembelajaran konkrit. J-TEQIP, , 38-43.

Jaeng, M. (2004). Pengembangan model pembelajaran matematika sekolah dengan cara perseorangan dan kelompok kecil. Disertasi. Surabaya: FKIP Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Karim, A. (2011). Penerapan metode penemuan terbimbing dalam pembelajaran matematika untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep dan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan. Tersedia: http://jurnal. upi.edu/file/3-Asrul_Karim.pdf [10 Oktober 2014].

Karso, (2003). Pendidikan matematika I. Pusat Penerbitan Universitas Terbuka. Departemen Pendidikan Nasioanal. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.

Kusumah & Dwitagama, D. (2012). Penelitian tindakan kelas. Jakarta: PT Indeks.

Rahmawati. (2013). Pengaruh pendekatan pendidikan realistik matematika dalam meningkatkan kemampuan dasar. Journal FMIPA Unila. 1(1), 14 halaman.

Slavin, R. E. (2005). Cooperative learning. Teori, riset dan praktik. Di terjemahkan oleh Narulita Yusron. Bandung: Nusa Media.

Suharjana & Sukayati, A. (2009). Pemanfaatan alat peraga matematika dalam pembelajaran di SD. Yogyakarta: P4TK Matematika.

Sutrisno. (2012). Efektivitas pembelajaran dengan metode penemuan terbimbing terhadap pemahaman konsep matematis siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. 1(4), 16 halaman.

Uno, H. B. & Nurdin, M. (2011). Belajar dengan pendekatan PAILKEM. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Widyantini. (2008). Penerapan pendekatan kooperatif STAD dalam pembelajaran matematika SMP. Paket Fasilitasi Pemberdayaan KKG/MGMP Matematika. Jogyakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Direktorat Jenderal Peningkatan Mutu Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan, Pusat Pengembangan dan Pemberdayaan Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan.

Downloads

Published

2017-06-30

How to Cite

Najmawati, Sudarman, & Rizal, M. (2017). The Application of Coopeartif Learning Model type STAD Assisted with Broad Transparent Diagrams, Alva board and Circle models to Improve Student Learning Outcomes on Broadly Simple Facets and Circles in Class VIA at SDN 15 Palu. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan MIPA, 1(1), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.22487/j25490192.2017.v1.i1.pp17-30

Issue

Section

Articles