The Differences Of Students’ Learning Outcomes Using Oral And Written Test On Biology Subject At SMA Labschool Palu
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22487/j25490192.2021.v5.i2.pp64-75Keywords:
Learning outcomes, oral test, and written testAbstract
The aim of this study to (1) determine the learning outcomes of students who use oral tests on biology subjects, (2) determine the learning outcomes of students who use written tests on biology subjects and (3) determine whether there are differences in student learning outcomes using oral tests and written tests on biology subjects. The populations of this study were all students of class X Mia and XI Mia, total of the students are 153 and the total samples of the study were 110 students. Based on the results of the calculation of the statistical analysis of the oral test and the written test, it shows that, in the oral test, students who get the poor category were 48 students with a percentage of 12.7% and in the sufficient category there were 7 students with a percentage of 87.2%, while in the good category once there were 0 students. In the written test the students who got the poor category were 33 students with a percentage of 60%, in the sufficient category there were 14 students with a percentage of 25.4%, in the good category there were 5 students with a percentage of 9, 0% and 3 students got very good category with a percentage of 5.4%. Based on the results of the calculation of the hypothesis test using the Wilcoxon test, it is known that in the Test Statistic output, Asymp.Sig (2-tailed) is 0,000. Because the value of 0.000 is less than 0.05, it can be concluded that "Ho is rejected". This means that there are differences in student learning outcomes between those given oral tests and those given written tests on biology subjects, with the average written test being higher than the average oral test, both class X Mia and class XI Mia.
Downloads
References
Arifin, A. (1995). Communication Studies. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada
Elfiza, R. (2017). The Effect Of Using Adventure Game And Picture To Improve Extroverted Students Speaking Skill. Gait Journal, 5 (1), 43-44
Ety, NI (2015). The Role of Communication in Teacher and Student Interaction. Al-Ta'dib Journal, 8 (2), 150-151
Fitriani. (2013). Comparison of Biology Learning Outcomes of Students of SMA AL Islam 3 Surakarta through written tests and oral tests in terms of self-concept. Publication Text: FKIP Muhammadiyah University Surakarta
Kadir, A. (2015). Compile And Analyze Learning Outcomes Tests. Al-Ta'dib Journal, 8 (2), 70-7
Matondang, Z. (2009). Reliability of a Research Instrument. Journal of Tabularsa PPS UNIMED, 6 (1), 87-97
Muttaqin, ZM and Kusaeri. (2017). Development of written test assessment instruments in the form of descriptions for Islamic Islamic studies based on problems in Islamic Civilization History. Tatsqif Journal, 15 (1), 1-23
Nana, SS (2013). Basis of Educational Process Psychology. Bandung: Youth Rosdakarya
Nanang, S. and Rani, D. (2016). Analysis of Students' Mathematical Communication Ability in Learning to Solve Flat-Building Problems. Journal of Mathematics Education, 7 (1), 1-9
Nita, J. (2014). The Influence of Test Types and Cognitive Abilities on Learning Outcomes of the Circulatory System Material. Research article: Tanjung Pura Pontianak University
Oktaviyanti, I. and Rosyidah, ANK (2019). Correlation Between Oral Test Results and Written Test Results on PGSD UNRAM Students. Journal of Educational Sciences, 2 (1), 9-19
Priyatno, D. (2010). Easy and Fast Techniques to Perform Research Data Analysis with SPSS. Yogyakarta: Media Style
Purwanto, N. (2004). Principles and Techniques of Teaching Evaluation. Bandung: PT. Rosdakarya
Rasyid, H. and Mansur. (2009). Assessment of Learning Outcomes. Bandung: Discourse Prima
Rokhmawan and Adhy, D. (2012). The difference in learning outcomes between written tests and oral tests on the subject of shallow foundation construction in students of the X-level building drawing engineering expertise program at SMK Negeri 5 Semarang, 2008/2009 academic year. Scaffoldin's Journal, 1 (1), 1-6
Ruhimat, M. (2018). Competency in Making Learning Outcomes Measurement Instruments by Social Studies Teachers in Junior High Schools in Bandung. Educational Lantern Journal, 21 (2), 176-187
Saidah, K. (2016). The Conformity Analysis of the Social Studies Assessment Instrument in Class V Teacher's Book with the Theme of the History of Indonesian Civilization with the Competence and Assessment Principles of Social Studies SD 2013 Curriculum. Journal of Archipelago Basic Education, 2 (1), 21-31
Samad and Arshad, A. (2013). The Use Of Portfolio As An Assessment Tool In The Malaysian L2 Classroom. International Journal of English Language Education, 1 (1), 94-108
Sugiyono. (2008). Educational Research Methods, Quantitative Approaches, Qualitative. Bandung: Alfabeta
Suharman. (2018). Tests as a Measure of Academic Achievement. Journal of Islamic Religious Education, 10 (1), 93-94
Umi, S. (2018). Quality Assurance of Educational Assessment. Journal of Evaluation, 2 (1), 283-284
Widyoko, EP (2012). Research Instrument Compilation Techniques. Yogyakarta: Student Library
Young, ME Klemz, BR and Murphy, JW (2003). Enhancing Learning Outcomes The Effects of Intructional Technology, Leraning Style, Instructional Methods and Student Behavior. Journal of Marketting Education, 2 (5), 130-13
yussa'diah, T. (2013). Comparison of Student Learning Outcomes Between Those Using Oral Tests and Essay Tests On the subject of rectangles and squares in class vii SMPN 8 Kota Cirebon. Thesis: IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
Yusuf, MM (2009). The Influence of Learning Methods and Motivation on Learning Outcomes of the Progmmable Logic Controller (PLC) of Class III Students of the Department of Electricity at SMK Negeri 5 Makassar. Medtek Journal, 1 (2), 2-3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Marwah Marwah, Mursito Bialangi, Mohammad Jamhari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
