The Implementation of Reciprocal Teaching Learning Strategies in Improving Students'Questioning and Cognitive Ability on The Concept of Human Digestive System in junior high schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22487/j25490192.2021.v5.i2.pp92-102Keywords:
Reciprocal, Student Questioning, Cognitive Ability, Digestive systemAbstract
This study aims to apply reciprocal learning strategies to improve students' questioning and cognitive abilities on the concept of the human digestive system. Classroom action research. The subjects of this study were 25 students. The research instruments consisted of tests, teacher observation sheets, student observation sheets and assessment sheets for questioning abilities and cognitive abilities. The results of the data analysis showed that there was an increase in the ability to ask questions and students' cognitive abilities from cycle I to cycle II which affected the increase in achievement indicators of learning outcomes. Cognitive abilities of class VIIIB students. From an average of 66 in the first cycle, it increased to an average of 88 in the second cycle and reached a minimum KKM of 70. The activities of teachers and students increased from cycle I to cycle II. It can be concluded that the application of the reciprocal teaching learning strategy can improve the ability to ask questions and the cognitive abilities of Class VIIIB students of SMP Negeri 7 Palu.
Downloads
References
Arikunto, S. (2009). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Aritonang, K. T. (2008). Minat dan motivasi dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa Jakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan Penabur, 7(10), 11-21.
Bowker, M. H. (2010). Teaching to ask questions instead of answering them. the nea higher Education Journal, 1(2), 127-134.
Chin, W. W. (2001). Tell us about their thinking?. education learning in science what do students' questions. Education Journal, 29 (2), 85-103.
Cholifah, S., Hendri, W., & Deswati, L. (2013). Analisis faktor penyebab kesulitan siswa dalam mengungkapkan soal dalam proses pembelajaran biologi di kelas VII. Jurnal E Bung Hatta, 2(4), 1-12.
Dimyati, M. (2010). Belajar dan belajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Farmer, L. S. (2014). What is a question? Education Journa,33(1), 41-49.
Hackers, D. J. & Tenent, A. (2002). Implementing reciprocal teaching in the classroom: Overcoming obstacles and making modifications. Journal of Educational Psycholog, 9(4), 699-718.
Hamalik, O. (2009). Kurikulum dan pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Hanifah, H. (2014). Hubungan antara kualitas soal siswa berdasarkan taksonomi Bloom dengan hasil belajar siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 4(3), 139-148.
Husen. (2013). Pengaruh pemberian penghargaan terhadap kemampuan bertanya pada mata pelajaran geografi pada topik hidrosfer. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 6(1), 14-45.
Kemendikbud. (2014). Peraturan menteri pendidikan dan kebudayaan, nomor 58, tahun 2004, tentang kurikulum 2013 sekolah menengah pertama (SMP) atau madrasah tsanawiyah (MTs).
Khusniah, D., & Dede, N. (2017). Pengaruh model pembelajaran resiprokal terhadap hasil belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran pencemaran lingkungan. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 14(1), 48-78.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2014). Materi pelatihan implementasi kurikulum. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Mariati. (2006). Pengembangan kreativitas siswa melalui soal-soal divergen pada mata pelajaran IPA. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 1(3), 756-773.
Novianti, R. (2017). Pengaruh model pembelajaran reciprocal teaching dengan teknik mind mapping terhadap kemampuan metakognisi dan kemampuan afektif pada konsep sistem sirkulasi pada siswa kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri 15 Bandar Lampung. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 8(1), 40-92.
Palincsar, A. S. & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction. Journal of the Institute of Pape, 1(2), 117-175
Prasetyo, Z. K. (1998). Taksonomi pendidikan jasmani (IPA) Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 4(1), 146-151.
Ragawanti, D. T. (2009). Pertanyaan dan teknik bertanya: pandangan preferensi siswa Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan, 11(2), 155-170.
Ralph, E. G, (1999). Oral-questioning skills of novice teachers any question?. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 26(4), 286-297.
Sardiman, A. M. (2004). Interaksi belajar mengajar dan motivasi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sardiman. (2009). Interaksi belajar mengajar dan motivasi. Jakarta: PT. Rajawali Pers.
Schermerhon, J. D., James, G. H., & Richard, N. O. (2007). Organitional behavior. New York: John Willey & Sons Inc.
Shen, P. & B. Yodkhumlue. (2006). Teacher's questioning and student's critical thinking in college elf reading classroom. the 8th international postgraduated research Colloqium: Interdiciplinary Approach.
Slameto. (2003). Belajar dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Surya, M. (2004). Psikologi belajar dan belajar. Bandung: Pustaka Bani Quarisy.
Widodo, P. (2012). Meningkatkan motivasi siswa untuk bertanya melalui metode snowball-throwding dalam pembelajaran PKN. Jurnal Pendidikan Penabur, 13(8), 42–55.
Widya, N., Anwar, Y. & Suratmi. (2017). Pengaruh penerapan model pembelajaran reciprocal teaching terhadap keterampilan metakognitif siswa kelas XI pada meteran sistem ekspresi. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 13(10), 7-17.
Winkel, W. S. (1987). Psikologi pengajaran. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Yulianti Yulianti, H. Andi Tanra Tellu, Amiruddin Kasim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
