Critical Thinking Profile of Junior High School Class VIII Students in Solving the Pythagoras Theorem Problem in Review of Spatial Ability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22487/j25490192.2020.v4.i1.pp12-24Keywords:
profile, pythagoras, spatial, critical thinking, problem solvingAbstract
The purpose of this research is to obtain a description of the critical thinking profile of Junior High School Class VIII students in solving the Pythagoras theorem problem in review of spatial ability. This research uses qualitative methods based on the category of critical thinking according to Jacob and Sam. The results of research showed a critical thinking profile of high spatial ability subject (MC) on the categories: (1) Clarification, namely formulating problems and information accurately and clearly, as well as describing rectangles, (2) Assessment, namely choosing and using the formula of another subject, one right triangle to facilitate problem solving, (3) Inference, which is making precise and clear conclusions based on the information obtained, (4) Strategies, namely predicting answers using triple Pythagoras and proposing other alternatives by choosing other right triangle images and making another formula. The critical thinking profile of moderate spatial ability subject (BT) on the categories: (1) Clarification, namely formulating problems and information precisely and clearly, and describing the square, (2) Assessment, which is choosing a physical triangle elbows to facilitate problem solving, using other lesson formulas, but the formula used is not correct, (3) Inference, which is making inaccurate conclusions because it is not accurate, (4) strategies, namely evaluating solutions that are lacking right and have no other way of solving problems. The critical thinking profile of low spatial ability subject (AR) on the categories: (1) clarification, which is to formulate problems and information clearly but less precisely by writing and reciting the answer and no rectangular images known,(2) Assessment, which is choosing and using an inappropriate formula with inappropriate reasons, (3) Inference (inference), which is making inaccurate conclusions, (4) Strategies, namely unable to propose or predict or evaluate the answer and also have no other way of solving problems.
Downloads
References
Aini, K. N. (2015). Proses koneksi matematika siswa berkemampuan tinggi dan rendah dalam memecahkan masalah bangun datar. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 1(3), 377-388.
Alwi, H. (2005). Kamus besar bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Ambarawati, M. (2014). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah dalam strategi think talk write (TTW). Jurnal Pedagogia, 5(2), 239-246.
Arfiani, D. W. (2017). Eksplorasi keterampilan pengajuan masalah matematika siswa SMP kelas VII dalam mereformulasi masalah. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 1(6),
Azustiani, H. (2017). Kemampuan spasial siswa SMP kelas VIII ditinjau dari kemampuan matematika siswa. Prosiding SI MaNIs (Seminar Nasional Integrasi Matematika dan Nilai Islami), (1),
Bell, F. H. (1978). Teaching and learning mathematics in secondary school. New York: Wm C Brown Company Publisher. Tersedia: Library.um.ac.id/free-contents/index.php/buku/detail/teaching-and-learning-mathematics-in-secondary-school-Frederick-h-bell-11945.html
Bochenski, J. M. (1980). Modern logic- a survey: Historical, philosophical, and mathematical aspects of modern logic and its application (e-book), Evandro Aggazi (eds.), Edition 1. Synthese Library 149.
Cockcroft, W. H. (1982). Mathematics counts (e-book). London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, .
DePorter, B. & Hernacki, M. (1992). Quantum learning, Abdurrahman, A (penerjemah), 2000. Quantum learning (Membiasakan belajar nyaman dan menyenangkan). Bandung: Kaifa.
Ennis, R. H. (1996). Critical thinking. New York: Freeman.
Fajari, A. (2013). Profil poses berpikir kritis siswa dalam pemecahan masalah matematika kontekstual ditinjau dari gaya kognitif field dependent-independent dan gender.
Fajarwati, H. N. (2017). Profil berpikir kritis siswa SMP dalam memecahkan masalah open-ended ditinjau dari kemampuan matematika. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 1(6),
Fardani, Z. (2017). Meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis dalam pembelajaran matematika untuk membangun karakter bangsa. Research gate.
Furrahmah, M. (2018). Kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa pada materi pola bilangan di kelas VIII MTSN Model Banda Aceh. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2),
Gardner, Howard. (1993). Frames of mind the theory of multiple intelligences (e-book). New York: Basic Books.
Giaquinto. (2007). Visual thinking in mathematics an epistemological study. New York: Oxford University Press.
Haryani, D. (2011). Pembelajaran matematika dengan pemecahan masalah untuk menumbuh kembangkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan Dan Penerapan Mipa, Fakultas MIPA, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Ilma, R. (2017). Profil berpikir analitis siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika berdasarkan gaya kognitif visualizer dan verbalizer di SMPN 25 Surabaya. Undergraduate thesis, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya.
Ismienar. (2009). Thinking. Malang. Universitas Negeri Malang. Tersedia: https://www.academia.edu/8527376/BERPIKIR_THINKING
Jacob, S. M. & Sam, H. K. (2008). Measuring critical thinking in problem-solving through online discussion forums in first-year university mathematics, Vol 1.
Johar, (2016). Kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa pada materi pola bilangan
di kelas VIII MTsN Model Banda Aceh. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika. 3(2), E-ISSN: 2614-1078.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan (Kemendikbud). (2017). Matematika: Buku guru. Jakarta: Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan, Balitbang, Kemendikbud.
Khaerudin. (2016). Teknik penskoran tes obyektif model pilihan ganda. Jurnal Madaniyah, 2 (11),
Kurniawan, E. H. (2013). Analisis hasil belajar fisika siswa berdasarkan kemampuan berpikir konkrit dan formal di SMAN 1 Abung Pekurun Kota Bumi. Skripsi. Universitas Lampung.
Miles, M. B, Huberman, M. & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis, a methods sourcebook, third edition. New York: SagePublications.
Mujahid, N. (2018). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis matematika siswa SMA Negeri 5 Wajo. Eprints Universitas Negeri Makassar.
Mujib & Mardiyah. (2017). Kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis berdasarkan kecerdasan multiple intelligences.Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2).
NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: NCTM.
Perkins, C. & Murphy, E. (2006). Identifying and measuring individual engagement in critical thinking in online discussions: An exploratory case study. Educational Technology, and Society, 9(1), 298-307.
Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it (e-book). New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Rahmawati, F. (2011). Meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis tentang sifat-sifat bangun ruang dengan menerapkan tipe numbered heads together pada siswa kelas V SD Negeri Balerejo 01 Kebonsari Madiun Tahun Pelajaran 2010/2011. Skripsi. Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta.
Retnowati, D. (2016). Proses berpikir kritis siswa kelas XI farmasi SMK Citra Medika Sragen dalam pemecahan masalah matematika. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika. 4(1),
Sabandar, J. (2008). Pembelajaran matematika sekolah dan permasalahan ketuntasan belajar matematika. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Salim, P., & Salim, Y. (2002). Kamus bahasa indonesia kontemporer. Jakarta: Modern English Press.
Saputra, H. (2018). Kemampuan spasial matematis. Research Gate.
Sari, T. N. I. (2017). Profil kemampuan berpikir kritis matematik siswa ditinjau dari kemampuan spasial dengan menggunakan graded response models(GRM). Undergraduate thesis. UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya.
Savitri, A. G. (2015). Profil industri kerajinan keramik pada sentra keramik klampok Kabupaten Banjarnegara. Skripsi. Digital Library Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Simbolon, M. (2017). The efforts to improving the mathematical critical thinking student’s ability through problem solving learning strategy by using Macromedia flash. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(7), 725-731.
Siswono & Tatag, Y. E. (2008). Model pembelajaran matematika berbasis pengajuan dan pemecahan masalah untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif. Surabaya :Unesa University Press.
Soedjadi, R. (2000). Kiat belajar matematika di Indonesia. Jakarta: Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan.
Solso, R. L. (2013). Cognitive psychology (e-book).
Syahputra, E., & Marpaung, R. (2016). Students’ mathematics representation and alternative solutions. Proceedings of the 1st Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL). 1.
Wijaya, C. (2010). Pendidikan remidial sarana pengembangan mutu sumber daya manusia. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Wulandari, F. (2017). Profil berpikir kritis siswa dalam memecahkan masalah teorema pythagoras ditinjau dari kemampuan matematika. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika. 1(6),
Yilmaz, H. B. (2009). On the development and measurement of spatial ability. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education. 1(2).
Yumniyati, K. (2016). Pengaruh jenis kelamin terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa kelas X pada Materi Geometri dikontrol dengan kemampuan Spasial Di SMA N 13 Semarang Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016. Skripsi. UIN Walisongo Semarang.
Zakiyah, F. (2013). Identifikasi kemampuan relating, experiencing, applying, cooperating dan transferring siswa dalam proses pembelajaran matematika dengan strategi react. Skripsi. IAIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya. T
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
